Factors Associated with the Choice of Peritoneal Dialysis in Iran: Qualitative Study

  • Seyedeh Masoumeh Ahmadi Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah
  • Amir Jalali Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Substance Abuse Prevention Research Centre, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah
  • Rostam Jalali Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah
Keywords: Peritoneal Dialysis, Decision-making, Content Analysis, Qualitative Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decision making about the type of dialysis in kidney failure is a matter of great importance involving the patients, his/her family, and the health care team. Identifying the factors influencing decision making for undergoing peritoneal dialysis helps the development of this therapeutic method in patients.

AIM: The present study aims at explaining the factors influencing decision making about undergoing PD in ESRD patients

METHOD: The present study is a qualitative research, which utilizes content analysis method. A semi-structured and in-depth interview was conducted with the 19 participants that selected by purposefully sampling. All interviews were recorded subsequent to receiving consent of the participants and were analyzed using content analysis method.

RESULTS: The first codification process resulted in 345 codes, which finally decreased to 278 codes by continuous reading and removal of duplicates. Overall, two main categories and eight categories namely facilitating factors (viz. family atmosphere, hemodialysis problems, PD advantages, and social environment) and inhibitory factors (viz. inefficient family, PD requirements, attitudes towards hemodialysis, and the country treatment system) were selected from the total 19 sub-categories and 278 codes.

CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated that various personal, family-related, psychological, social, and economic factors could affect the decision on the type of dialysis in patients. Therefore, basic infrastructures such as social support, education, and even the specialist and positive perspective of the Ministry of Health are required to choose this therapeutic method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Morton R, et al. The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BmJ. 2010; 340: 112. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c112 PMid:20085970 PMCid:PMC2808468

Sinnakirouchenan R, Holley JL. Peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis: risks, benefits, and access issues. Advances in chronic kidney disease. 2011; 18(6): 428-432. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2011.09.001 PMid:22098661

Rygh E, et al. Choosing to live with home dialysis-patients' experiences and potential for telemedicine support: a qualitative study. BMC nephrology. 2012; 13(13): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-13-13

Health M. Firteen progressive in kidney disease patients in past ten years 2013; Available from: http://www.sportmedicine.ir/modules.php?name=contents&t=371.

Harwood L, Clark AM. Dialysis modality decision-making for older adults with chronic kidney disease. J Clin Nurs. 2014; 23(23-24):3378-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12582 PMid:24646195

Liang CH, et al. Factors affecting peritoneal dialysis selection in Taiwanese patients with chronic kidney disease. International Nursing Review. 2011; 58(4):463-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00913.x PMid:22092325

Johansson L. Shared decision making and patient involvement in choosing home therapies. J Ren Care. 2013; 39(Suppl 1): 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6686.2013.00337.x PMid:23464908

Nakamura-Taira N, et al. Views of Japanese patients on the advantages and disadvantages of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. International urology and nephrology. 2013; 45(4): 1145-1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0322-x PMid:23161376

Bratzke LC, et al. Self-management priority setting and decision-making in adults with multimorbidity: a narrative review of literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52(3):744-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.10.010 PMid:25468131 PMCid:PMC4315694

Baillie J, Lankshear A. Patient and family perspectives on peritoneal dialysis at home: findings from an ethnographic study. J Clin Nurs. 2015; 24(1-2):222-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12663 PMid:25256788

Spezial HS, Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.

LoBiondo-Wood G, et al. Study Guide for Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-based Practice: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013.

Peyrovi H, Seyedfatemi N, Jalali A. The Role of Family Atmosphere in the Relapse Behavior of Iranian Opiate Users: a Qualitative Study. Journal of caring sciences. 2015; 4(3):189-196. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.019 PMid:26464835 PMCid:PMC4591608

Agerskov H, et al. From donation to everyday life: Living kidney donors' experiences three months after donation. Journal of Renal Care. 2016; 42(1):43-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12137 PMid:26463844

Hope J. A patient perspective on the barriers to home dialysis. J Ren Care. 2013; 39(Suppl 1):3-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6686.2013.00333.x PMid:23464907

Berger JR, Jaikaransingh V, Hedayati SS. End-Stage Kidney Disease in the Elderly: Approach to Dialysis Initiation, Choosing Modality, and Predicting Outcomes. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016; 23(1):36-43. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2015.08.005 PMid:26709061

Chow SK, Wong FK. Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: effects of a nurse-led case management programme. J Adv Nurs. 2010; 66(8):1780-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05324.x PMid:20557392

Robinski M, Mau W, Wienke A, Girndt M. Shared decision-making in chronic kidney disease: A retrospection of recently initiated dialysis patients in Germany. Patient education and counseling. 2016; 99(4):562-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.014 PMid:26527307

Griva K, et al. Perspectives of patients, families, and health care professionals on decision-making about dialysis modality--the good, the bad, and the misunderstandings! Perit Dial Int. 2013; 33(3):280-289. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2011.00308 PMid:23123668 PMCid:PMC3649897

Wang TJ, et al. Factors influencing peritoneal dialysis patients' psychosocial adjustment. Journal of clinical nursing. 2014; 23(1-2):82-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12045 PMid:23311545

Ghafari A, et al. Effect of an educational program on awareness about peritoneal dialysis among patients on hemodialysis. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2010; 21(4):636-40. PMid:20587865

Published
2018-07-19
How to Cite
1.
Ahmadi SM, Jalali A, Jalali R. Factors Associated with the Choice of Peritoneal Dialysis in Iran: Qualitative Study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2018Jul.19 [cited 2020Nov.27];6(7):1253-9. Available from: https://www.id-press.eu/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2018.255
Section
B - Clinical Sciences

Most read articles by the same author(s)