Evaluation of Fast Glycaemia in Hypertonic Population that Suffer from Diabetes: The Importance of Self-Monitoring of Glycemic Level and the Effects of Interactions, with the Aim of Reducing the Levels of Fast Glycaemia in These Patients

  • Edlira Lashi Primary Healthcare Clinic Nr. 1, Endocrinology, Tirana
  • Fatos Lashi Primary Health Care Center, “Egian”, General Medicine, Tirana
  • Klotilda Muca Primary Health Care Center, “Egian”, General Medicine, Tirana
  • Bora Ballta Primary Healthcare Center, “Klinika Italiane S. Antonio”, Tirana
  • Suzana Kazazi Primary Healthcare Clinic Nr. 1, Endocrinology, Tirana
Keywords: HC, Self - monitoring, Glycemia, Hypertension, Glucometer

Abstract

AIM: Identification of glycemic level tendency rates in a hypertonic population that suffers from diabetes mellitus in Health Centre Nr. 1, Tirana, evaluation of self-monitoring and the effects of interactions, with the aim of reducing the levels of fast glycaemia in these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the study participated 810 patients of Health Centre Nr 1 in Tirana that suffer from hypertension and diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2. The study was conducted through 10 months’ period. The patients that owned glucometer passed through the process of calibration of the devices, the others that had no glucometer had been given one. All the patients had been instructed how to use the device properly. Informative and educative materials regarding hypertension and diabetes were given to them. A standardised table was used to collect all the data. Changes in therapy were done regarding the glycemic levels.

RESULTS: The most of the patient shown an important improvement in glycemic rates during ten months of study. From 810 patients, 617 of them shown an improvement of the glycemic level data (median = 24 mg/dl; IQR: 14 – 50 mg/dl), and the other 193 patients have shown no improvement (n = 11) or aggravation (n = 182). The data showed that the patients that had no improvement during the study have diabetes type one (40%), they that have shown improvement has diabetes type 2 (33%) The difference between 2 those groups were insignificant (p = 0.075). The data of glycemic levels shown a significant decreased of 19% of basal glycemic levels (128 ± 31 vs. 158 ± 55 mg/dl: p < 0.05) at the end of the study, and decreased of glycemic levels was visible especially after the first month of the study, in both groups male and females.

CONCLUSION: A total of 205 therapy changes like adding a new or two drugs or an increase of doses of the drugs, are done in some 181 patients that have diabetes, with a frequency of 1.1 changes in therapy per patient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(Suppl 1):S81–S90. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-S081 PMid:24357215

Galtier F. Definition, epidemiology, risk factors. Diabetes Metab. 2010; 36:628–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2010.11.014 PMid:21163426

Kharroubi AT, Darwish HM. Diabetes mellitus: The epidemic of the century. World journal of diabetes. 2015;6(6):850. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v6.i6.850 PMid:26131326 PMCid:PMC4478580

American Diabetes Association. Older adults. Sec. 10. In Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2016. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39(Suppl.1):S81–S85. PMid:26696686

Diabetes. WHO Fact sheet N°312, Updated January, 2015.

Global Report on Diabetes. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2016.

Toti F, Agaçi F, Bejtja G, Golay A. Diabetes Mellitus in Albania: A Two Fold Increase in the Last Decade. 2011: 60-69.

ISKSH, statistika. 2013.

IFD Diabetes Atlas-7th Edition.

Diabetes Care. 2016; 39(Suppl. 1):S1–S2. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-S001

Benjamin EM. Self-monitoring of blood glucose: the basics. Clin Diabetes. 2002; 20:45–47. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.20.1.45

Polonsky WH, Fisher L. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in noninsulin-using type 2 diabetic patients: right answer, but wrong question: self-monitoring of blood glucose can be clinically valuable for noninsulin users. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(1):179-82. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0731 PMid:23264290 PMCid:PMC3526239

Franciosi M, Pellegrini F, De Berardis G, Belfiglio M, Cavaliere D, Di Nardo B, Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Sacco M, Tognoni G, Valentini M, Nicolucci A. QuED Study Group: The impact of blood glucose self-monitoring on metabolic control and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients: an urgent need for better educational strategies. Diabetes Care 2001; 24:1870–1877. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.11.1870 PMid:11679449

Published
2018-02-14
How to Cite
1.
Lashi E, Lashi F, Muca K, Ballta B, Kazazi S. Evaluation of Fast Glycaemia in Hypertonic Population that Suffer from Diabetes: The Importance of Self-Monitoring of Glycemic Level and the Effects of Interactions, with the Aim of Reducing the Levels of Fast Glycaemia in These Patients. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2018Feb.14 [cited 2020Dec.5];6(2):355-8. Available from: https://www.id-press.eu/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2018.065
Section
B - Clinical Sciences