3D Finite Element Study on: Bar Splinted Implants Supporting Partial Denture in the Reconstructed Mandible

  • Mohamed El-Anwar National Research Centre, Mechanical Engineering, Giza
  • Rami Ghali Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Removable Prosthodontics, Cairo
  • Mona Aboelnagga Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Removable Prosthodontics, Cairo
Keywords: Finite element method, Stress Distribution, Bar splinted implants, Reconstructed Mandible, Partial Denture

Abstract

AIM: This study aimed to estimate the stress patterns induced by the masticatory loads on a removable prosthesis supported and retained by bar splinted implants placed in the reconstructed mandible with two different clip materials and without clip, in the fibula-jaw bone and prosthesis using finite element analysis.

METHODS: Two 3D finite element models were constructed, that models components were modeled on commercial CAD/CAM software then assembled into finite element package. Vertical loads were applied simulating the masticatory forces unilaterally in the resected site and bilaterally in the central fossa of the lower first molar as 100N (tension and compression). Analysis was based on the assumption full osseointegration between different types of bones, and between implants and fibula while fixing the top surface of the TMJ in place.

RESULTS: The metallic bar connecting the three implants is insensitive to the clips material. Its supporting implants showed typical behavior with maximum stress values at the neck region. Fibula and jaw bone showed stresses within physiologic, while clips material effect seems to be very small due to its relatively small size.

CONCLUSION: Switching loading force direction from tensile to compression did-not change the stresses and deformations distribution, but reversed their sign from positive to negative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Hoffman GR, Islam S, Eisenberg RL. Microvascular reconstruction of the mouth, face and jaws. Oromandibular reconstruction - free fibula flap. Aust Dent J. 2012;57(3):379-87.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01709.x

PMid:22924365

Dalkiz M, Beydemir B, Günaydin Y. Treatment of a microvascular reconstructed mandible using an implant-supported fixed partial denture: case report. Implant Dent. 2001;10(2):121-5.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200104000-00008

PMid:11450411

Schrag C, Chang YM, Tsai CY, Wei FC. Complete rehabilitation of the mandible following segmental resection. J Surg Oncol. 2006;94(6):538-45.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.20491

PMid:17061277

Lizuka T, Hafliger J, Seto I, Rahal A. Oral rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction using an osteocutaneous fibula free flap with endosseous implant, Factors affecting functional outcome in patients with oral cancer. Clinical Oral Implant Research. 2005;16(1):69-79.

Parbo N, Murra NT, Andersen K, Buhl J, Kiil B, Nørholt SE. Outcome of partial mandibular reconstruction with fibula grafts and implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(11):1403- 8.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.05.007

PMid:23773236

Converse JM, Kawamoto HK, Wood-Smith D, Coccaro PJ, McCarthy JG. Deformities of the Jaws. In Converse JM. (Ed.), Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, Second Edition, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1977.

Yagihara K, Okabe S, Ishii J, Amagasa T, Yamashiro M, Yamaguchi S, et al. Mandibular reconstruction using a poly (L-lactide) mesh combined with autogenous particulate cancellous bone and marrow: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(8):962-9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.03.010

PMid:23602482

Riediger D. Restoration of masticatory function by microsurgically revascularized bone grafts using endosseous implants. Plastic reconstruction surgery. 1988;81(6):861-77.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198806000-00007

Helman JI, Blanchaert RH. Microvascular free tissue transfer. Peterson's principles of oral and maxillofacial surgery, London, Decker 2004:803-19.

Myoung H., KimYy, Heo Ms, Lee Ss. Comparative radiologic study of bone density and cortical thickness of donor bone. Oralsurgery, oralmedicine, Oral Radiology, 2001; 92(1): 23-9.

Teoh Kh, Hcryn Jm, Patel S, Halpern J, Tunick S, Wong HB, et al. Implant prosthodontic rehabilitation of fibula free flap reconstructed mandible. Int J of Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20(1):738-46.

PMid:16274148

Urken ML, Buchbinder D, Weinberg H, Vickery C, Sheiner A, Biller HF. Primary placement of osseointegrated implants in microvascular mandibular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;101(1):56-73.

PMid:2547185

Bahr W, Stoll P, Wachter R. Use of the "double barrel" free vascularized fibula in mandibular reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;56(1):38-44.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90914-4

Garrett N, Roumanas ED, Blackwell KE, Freymiller E, Abemayor E, Wong WK, et al. Efficacy of conventional and implant supported mandibular resection prostheses: Study overview and treatment outcomes. Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2006;96(1):13-24.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.010

PMid:16872926

Roumanas ED, Garrett NR, Blackwell KE. Masticatory swallowing threshold performances with conventional and implant supported prostheses after mandibular fibula free flap reconstruction. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96:289-97.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.015

PMid:17052474

Chana JS, Chang YM, Wei FC. Segmental mandibulectomy and immediate free fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap reconstruction with endosteal implants. An ideal treatment method for mandibular ameloblastoma. J Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;1:80-7.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000097719.69616.29

PMid:14707625

Beumer J, Curtis TA, Marunick MT. Maxillofacial rehabilitation: prosthodontic and surgical management of cancer related, acquired and congenital defects of the head and neck. Third Edition. Quintessence publishing co., 2011.

Naert I, Al saadi G, Van steenberghe D. A 10- year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and un-splinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri implant outcome. Int J of Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(1):695-702.

PMid:15508985

Tie Y, Wang DM, Ji T, Wang CT, Zhang CP. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical effects of human mandibular reconstruction with autogenous bone grafts. J of Cranio Maxillofac Surgery. 2006;34(1):290-8.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2006.03.004

PMid:16781160

Nagasao T, Kobayashi M, Tsuchiya Y, Kaneko T, Nakajima T. Finite element analysis of the stresses around endosseous implants in various reconstructed mandibular models. J of Cranio Maxillofac Surgery. 2002;30(1):170-7.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2002.0310

Nagasao T, Miyamoto J, Kawana H. Biomechanical evaluation of implant placement in the reconstructed mandible. Int J of Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(1):999-1005.

PMid:20162103

Strackee SD, Kroon FHM, Bos KE. Fixation methods in mandibular reconstruction using fibula grafts. J Head Neck Surg. 2000;23:1-7.

Kohnke P. ANSYS Theory Reference Manual, Ansys Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2013.

Ken Y, Noriko T, Shohei K. Three-dimensional finite elemental analysis of bone stress near an implant placed at the border between mandible and fibular graft in mandibular reconstruction. Open Journal of Regenerative Medicine (OJRM). 2015;4:35-45.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojrm.2015.44005

El-Anwar MI, El-Mofty MS, Fawzy UM. The influence of different gingival thickness on stress to implant-supported overdenture and bone. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS). 2014;13(3):17-23.

http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/0853-13321723

Valentim A, Wirley C, Lucas F. Effect of mucosa thickness on stress distribution of implant retained overdenture. J Comp Meth Prog Biomed. 2008;92:213-23.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.07.009

PMid:18783845

Ree JS. An investigation into the importance of the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone as supporting structures in finite element studies. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;5:425-32.

Militsakh ON, Werle A. Comparison of radial forearm with fibula and scapula osteocutaneous free flaps for oromandibular reconstruction. J Otolaryng Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:571-5.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.7.571

Gaggl AJ, Burger HK, Chiari FM. The microvascular osteocutaneous femur transplant for covering combined alveolar ridge and floor of mouth defects: preliminary report. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2008;24:169-75.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1076753

PMid:18454356

Hundepool AC, Dumans AG, Hafer S. Rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap: clinical outcome and quality of life assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;11:1009-13.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.05.021

PMid:18657394

Balouri A, Zatman RR. Fabrication of custom clips for bar and clip attachments for implant supported overdentures. J prosthet Dent. 2006;96:379-80.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.018

PMid:17098504

Krennmair G, Krainhofer M, Piehslinger E. The influence of bar design on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by four implants. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21:514-20.

PMid:19149069

Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures. J Impl Dent. 2006;15:24-34.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202419.21665.36

PMid:16569958

Sugivra T, Horiuchi K, Kusano M. Stress analysis of mandibular reconstruction using fibular grafts by the three dimensional finite element method. J Distract Osteogen and Reconstr Surg. 2000;2:165-70.

Menicucci G, Lorenzetti M, Pera P. Mandibular implant retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl. 1998;13:369-75.

PMid:9638007

Kawasaki T, Takayama Y, Yamada T. Relationship between the stress distribution and the shape of the alveolar residual ridge: Three dimensional behaviour of a lower complete denture. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:950-4.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00771.x

PMid:11737567

Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas Júnior AC, Anchieta RB, Poveda R, Gupta N, et al. Tilted and short implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: A 3D-FEA biomechanical evaluation. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2015;17(1):e332-42.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12129

PMid:23910435

Nagaso T, Miyamoto J, Kawana H. Biomechanical evaluation of implant placement in the reconstructed mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl. 2009;24:999-1005.

Wong R, Tideman H, Merkx M. Finite element analysis of ednoprosthesis reconstruction of the mandible. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg. 2012;40:487-97.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.03.010

PMid:22516866

Enlow DH. Wolff's law and the problem of muscle attachment on resorptive surfaces of bone. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1966;24:205-13.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330240209

PMid:4957122

Jędrusik-Pawłowskam, Kromka-Szydek M, Katram, Niedzielska I. Mandibular reconstruction biomechanical strength analysis (FEM) based on a retrospective clinical analysis of selected patient. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics. 2013;15(2):32-31.

Published
2016-02-09
How to Cite
1.
El-Anwar M, Ghali R, Aboelnagga M. 3D Finite Element Study on: Bar Splinted Implants Supporting Partial Denture in the Reconstructed Mandible. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2016Feb.9 [cited 2020Nov.29];4(1):164-71. Available from: https://www.id-press.eu/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2016.027
Section
D - Dental Sciences