Differentiating Benign from Suspicious Vertebral Marrow Lesions Detected with Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Diffusion-Weighted Image

  • Khaleel Ibraheem Mohson National Cancer Research Center, University of Baghdad, Iraq
  • Qusay Tayser Naief Magnetic Resonance Unit, Oncology Teaching Hospital, Medical City Complex, Iraq
  • Farah Abdul Jalil National Cancer Research Center, University of Baghdad, Iraq
Keywords: Vertebral metastasis, Magnetic resonance imaging, Apparent diffusion coefficient, Diffusion-weighted imaging


BACKGROUND: Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, include the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), are of great benefit in assessing troublesome vertebral marrow lesion in patients presented with primary malignancy outside the spines.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of vertebral column MRI in characterization and evaluation of marrow lesion in patients with primary malignancy utilizing ADC and DWI in addition to conventional MRI sequences.

METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study which includes 80 patients referred to MR unit 58 of them referred from the oncology department in oncology teaching hospital having primary cancer outside the spine and also referred complaining of back pain and worry from metastasis while the remaining 22 are cancer-free patients referred to MRI because of lower back pain – the study was performed in Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq, during the period from the beginning of September 2018–October 2019.

RESULTS: The study sample consists of 55 females and 25 males, the breast cancer is main primary in females and represents 30/58 patients, while the prostate is the main cancer in males and represents 7/58 patients. When correlating the MR sequences (T1W, Fat sat and DWI) all together and after addition of ADC value (<9x10-3 mm2/sec) in diagnosis of malignancy there is decreasing frequency of positive cases from 39% before ADC to 22.4% after adding it which is close to histopathology results (17% ). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of ADC in detecting metastasis within the vertebral marrow are 94%, 95%, 88.9%, 97.5%, and 94.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Conventional MRI using standard T1W, T2 weighted, and fat suppression sequences cannot discriminate between benign and pathological vertebral marrow lesions. Using DWI improves the recognition of pathological bony lesion(s) and this is strengthened when enforced by ADC value and by that, it can replace the need for intravenous contrast administration. DWI and ADC are beneficial in follow-up of previously detected restricted lesion and in assessment its response to treatment that was depicted by measuring its ADC that consequently elevated in healing phase.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block


Coleman RE, Lipton A, Roodman GD, Guise TA, Boyce BF, Brufsky AM, et al. Metastasis and bone loss: Advancing treatment and prevention. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36(8):615 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.04.003 PMid:20478658

Sathiakumar N, Delzell E, Morrisey MA, Falkson C, Yong M, Chia V, et al. Mortality following bone metastasis and skeletal-related events among women with breast cancer: A population-based analysis of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries, 1999-2006. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131(1):231-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1721-x PMid:21842243

Tanaka R, Yonemori K, Hirakawa A, Kinoshita F, Takahashi N, Hashimoto J, et al. Risk factors for developing skeletal-related events in breast cancer patients with bone metastases undergoing treatment with bone-modifying agents. Oncologist. 2016;21(4):508-13. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0377 PMid:26975863

Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE, Michaux L, Ferrant A, Maldague B, Malghem J. Magnetic resonance imaging of the bone marrow in hematological malignancies. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(8):1335-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050548 PMid:9853210

Lecouvet FE, Larbi A, Pasoglou V, Omoumi P, Tombal B, Michoux N, et al. MRI for response assessment in metastatic bone disease. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(7):1986-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2792-3 PMid:23455764

Huisman TA. Diffusion-weighted imaging: Basic concepts and application in cerebral stroke and head trauma. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(10):2283-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-1843-6 PMid:14534804

Subhawong TK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterizing musculoskeletal lesions. Radiographics. 2014;34(5):1163-77. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.345140190 PMid:25208274

Matrawy KA, El-Nekeidy AA, El-Sheridy HG. Atypical hemangioma and malignant lesions of spine: Can diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging help to differentiate? Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2013;44:259-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2013.03.001

Malayeri AA, El Khouli RH, Zaheer A, Jacobs MA, Corona-Villalobos CP, Kamel IR, et al. Principles and applications of diffusion-weighted imaging in cancer detection, staging, and treatment follow-up. Radiographics. 2011;31(6):1773-91. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.316115515 PMid:21997994

Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: Applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1622-235.

Neil JJ. Diffusion imaging concepts for clinicians. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(1):1-7. PMid:18050325

Wu LM, Gu HY, Zheng J, Xu X, Lin LH, Deng X, et al. Diagnostic value of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for bone metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;34(1):128-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23697 PMid:21618333

Lecouvet FE, El Mouedden J, Collette L, Coche E, Danse E, Jamar F, et al. Can whole-body magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging replace Tc 99m bone scanning and computed tomography for single-step detection of metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer? Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.020 PMid:22366187

Mubarak F, Akhtar W. Acute vertebral compression fracture: Differentiation of malignant and benign causes by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61(6):555-8. PMid:22204209

Tadros MY, Louka AL, between malignant marrow diffusion and shift DB. Discrimination between benign and malignant in vertebral marrow lesions with diffusion weighted MRI and chemical shift. Egyp J Radiol Nucl Med. 2016;47:557-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2016.02.007

Barchetti F, Stagnitti A, Megna V, Al Ansari N, Marini A, Musio D, et al. Unenhanced whole-body MRI versus PET-CT for the detection of prostate cancer metastases after primary treatment. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20(18):3770-6. PMid:27735042

Gong J, Cao W, Zhang Z, Deng Y, Kang L, Zhu P, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of tumour recurrence and metastasis by comparison with 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography o computed tomography in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2015;3(2):128-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gou078 PMid:25406465

How to Cite
Mohson KI, Naief QT, Jalil FA. Differentiating Benign from Suspicious Vertebral Marrow Lesions Detected with Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Diffusion-Weighted Image. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2020Mar.20 [cited 2020Oct.31];8(B):114-8. Available from: https://www.id-press.eu/mjms/article/view/3895
Radiology and Radiotherapy